The Skeptical Mind : ZetaTalk, The Grand Conspiracy 1995

From: Nancy (saquo@ix.netcom.com)
Subject: re: The "zeta" in ZetaTalk
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 1996/12/26

In article <32BFB12D.4001@macromedia.com> Henry Warwick threatens:
> Anybody got the poop on her? I know she lives somewhere
> down the peninsula, but I forget where. Let's post her address
> and phone number and all that other info we can get on her by
> digging deep enough on the net....
> Henry Warwick <hwarwick@macromedia.com>

Just to make it perfectly clear - HENRY IS INCOMPETENT TO ENGAGE IN THE
ONGOING DEBATES HERE ON SCI.ASTRO. So sorry, Henry, that you're so
incompetent and desperate, and that frothing at the mouth is the best
you can do.

Isn't this off-topic for sci.astro? I fully expect that I, NANCY, will
get chastized for posting this and that Henry won't even get a mean
glance. That's the way things go on sci.astro, where the shepards
allow the likes of Henry to say and do anything they desire, especially
when the postings challenge the sacred gods the shepards worship.

Henry so nicely proves the point the Zetas were making, I must say.
Lets see, what was that they said about threatened, mindless children?

(Begin ZetaTalk[TM])

This tendency to behave as a mindless child is most dramatized in
scientific communities, where logic and the ability to think matters
through is assumed. In stark contrast to what humans expect from their
scientists, the adult child prates the laws of their gods and refuse to
put obvious contradictions alongside of these laws. They look the
other way. They throw insults. They walk off in a huff. Anything but
be forced to grow up and think for themselves!

(End ZetaTalk[TM])


		The Zeta Reticulans Get Angry
	Sometimes Nancy Lieder's infallable and benevolent aliens get rather angry and nasty. The Zetas were compelled to respond harshly to a joke made on the sci.astro newsgroup that Nancy might be in need of Thorazine etc.
	From: Nancy (saquo@ix.netcom.com) Subject: Re: The "zeta" in ZetaTalk Newsgroups: sci.astro Date: 1996/12/24 (Begin ZetaTalk[TM]) Our emissary, Nancy, has NEVER taken psychoactive drugs nor has anyone other than the scum on this Usenet message board ever suggested that be the case. She works a professional job that would put YOURS to shame, has all her life, and is highly regarded by her peers. Since you're into personal questions, Peter, lets address YOUR life, and see if YOU have the guts to respond. How is it that you ask this question, but cannot enter into a discussion about how Newton is a God and the like. Are you an astronomer? You are NOT, nor do you even know the first thing about astronomy. You're a paid lackey, send in here to ask silly and irrelevant questions, so that those who pay you can't be accused of asking them. Prove to us this is NOT the case, Peter, and enter into the Revolution debate, on a daily basis, from now on out as we intend to do. Double dare you, you spineless hireling! (End ZetaTalk[TM])

	Further examples of Nancy / Zeta hostility will be cataloged below:
	From: Nancy (saquo@ix.netcom.com) Subject: re: The "zeta" in ZetaTalk Newsgroups: sci.astro Date: 1996/12/26 In article <32BFB12D.4001@macromedia.com> Henry Warwick threatens: > Anybody got the poop on her? I know she lives somewhere > down the peninsula, but I forget where. Let's post her address > and phone number and all that other info we can get on her by > digging deep enough on the net.... > Henry Warwick <hwarwick@macromedia.com> Just to make it perfectly clear - HENRY IS INCOMPETENT TO ENGAGE IN THE ONGOING DEBATES HERE ON SCI.ASTRO. So sorry, Henry, that you're so incompetent and desperate, and that frothing at the mouth is the best you can do. Isn't this off-topic for sci.astro? I fully expect that I, NANCY, will get chastized for posting this and that Henry won't even get a mean glance. That's the way things go on sci.astro, where the shepards allow the likes of Henry to say and do anything they desire, especially when the postings challenge the sacred gods the shepards worship. Henry so nicely proves the point the Zetas were making, I must say. Lets see, what was that they said about threatened, mindless children? (Begin ZetaTalk[TM]) This tendency to behave as a mindless child is most dramatized in scientific communities, where logic and the ability to think matters through is assumed. In stark contrast to what humans expect from their scientists, the adult child prates the laws of their gods and refuse to put obvious contradictions alongside of these laws. They look the other way. They throw insults. They walk off in a huff. Anything but be forced to grow up and think for themselves! (End ZetaTalk[TM])

	BACK