Part 1 : Why my unseemly interest in wanting to prove the accuracy of ZetaTalk?
So why my determination, why my unseemly interest in wanting to prove the accuracy of ZetaTalk? Well, I admit it was less about wanting to save mankind from this looming disaster and more about wanting to help build and promote a website which I believed offered a lot of commonsense solutions to the problems plaguing our society today. Some of the energy I had for promoting ZetaTalk probably derived from an uncomfortable situation I was emerging from. I discovered ZetaTalk while sitting in an Internet Café located on the outskirts of Taipei City, Taiwan, an area considered to have one of the highest population densities in the world. In many ways, I considered that place hell on earth, capitalistic forces gone amuck, an artificial world run by greed, preying on ignorance and apathy, creating misery for all but the big cats sitting on top, who probably didn't even live in Taiwan. Anyway, to make it short, I was upset and what I found in ZetaTalk was a possible answer to the destructive and chaotic forces ruling the planet. Certainly, I would exalt to see places like Taipei City and its counterparts in other countries vanish, but I didn't see the pole shift itself as being a saving
grace. Even if the earth was given a clean slate again, it was uncertain that we humans wouldn't repeat our own mistakes and be back at square one within a couple millennia. So what appealed to me so much about ZetaTalk was not only the pole shift information, but the fact that it offered a new paradigm for living, a paradigm which I believed was it all it promised to be.

I admired the Zetas and ZetaTalk for several reasons. They showed an incredible concern for the environment; they said that money was not an economic necessity in a society in which individuals were more mature and connected (a society in which volunteer-ism was more the rule than the exception); they said that democracy was a good start, but democracy didn't work so well when immature or selfish entities had equal or disproportionate influence; they expressed a disgust for the arrogant behaviors of the elite class (speaking to the fact that those in visible positions of power can wear very service-oriented masks yet be very self-centered individuals); they suggested that telepathy was a solution to the confusion we experience when
evaluating other people's motives; they showed a mature, clear understanding of human behavior (why we do all the crazy, screwy
stuff that we do). And I could probably list 100 more reasons why I was attracted to ZetaTalk. So ZetaTalk became my new passion in life and I considered Nancy to be a very competent gifted individual. I wanted to do what I could to help Nancy and give ZetaTalk the little extra momentum that it needed. Simultaneously, though, I knew ZetaTalk was an experiment of sorts, and I was highly interested in seeing how this experiment would play out. I accepted that what Nancy and the Zetas were saying was sincere and true (the material was simply too extraordinary in scientific understanding and detail for it not to be true). However, what was more uncertain to me (and Nancy I'm sure) is how ZetaTalk would play out in other people's minds.

Some of the questions I asked myself were : What kind of folks would be drawn to this material? What kind of discussions would it generate? Would it indeed encourage folks to reconsider their mainstream lives and attachments and start joining with like-minded individuals to form peaceful survival communities? Would society be revolutionized by this information? So essentially I was keeping my mind open, allowing for various outcomes, knowing that this was an experiment of sorts. As I knew the information quite well and was highly convinced that it was true and was of enormous relevance to society, I defended ZetaTalk often and certainly promoted it through my volunteer work at TT Hub. However, with so much of my energy being put into ZetaTalk and helping Nancy and also realizing the impact of this information and its potential ripple-effect through the coming centuries, I didn't want to simply surrender my voice and become one of Nancy's good soldiers. So even as I worked with Nancy I often questioned ZetaTalk and Nancy and did my best to protect ZetaTalk from interpretations or forces which I felt threatened to undermine my own interpretation of ZetaTalk. This questioning took many forms. I questioned the formation of TT-Welcome because I felt there was a potential for abuse (a few people wanting to increase their popularity while perhaps fostering some kind of dependence). I spoke out when some people started engaging in ego-centered discussions about graduating to the next density level or being saviors for mankind. I warned that Nancy's endless promotion of ZetaTalk Accuracy may skew people's ability to judge ZetaTalk by more important criteria, such as the model of governance it was proposing. I expressed upset when Nancy used data on volcanic eruptions that was clearly misleading. I questioned Nancy when she essentially gave the Democratic Party a glowing endorsement because much of what the Democrat Party represents is still very at odds with ZetaTalk. I questioned TT members about their understanding of what the word "cult" means, and asked if such elements do indeed exist within ZetaTalk and the TT membership.
BACK
PART 2 >>>