From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: The Sun has no South Pole (OT)
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2001-11-25 06:25:39 PST
Thanks Greg, I was going to post it myself but you beat me to it. Maybe Steve should "redefine" the word "slander" now, or at least start researching things before he makes statements like " Look up "cult" in a dictionary". But then again, that's standard for the cult members - make statements without any prior knowledge of what they're talking about. Other than the dictionary definition, Ms. Emmisary's own actions on her Yahoo groups board take the definition one step farther. She attacks her own members that disagree with her, and ban them from posting any messages that disagree with hers. She's also slandered and attacked members of other Planet X boards (specifically Mike Hazelwood, wgho also has a book out) in an attempt to keep her sheep in line. There's no discussion allowed, what she says is gospel. These are tactics well learned from the cult of scientology. The only "proof" they have to offer is a conspiracy theory, that everyone in the world has had the wool pulled over their eyes by the "powers that be". In a sense, that's true, but the ones being misled are those that sunscibe to the Cult Leader's philosophy and poorly written scenario of "doom and gloom". I guess some people don't learn from prior messages - Jonestown, Heaven's Gate, L. Ron Hubbard, etc. They probably will even stick with Ms Emmisary when she declares that the Zetas have managed to "move" Planet X away from Earth so that it doesn't appear in 2003. I can't wait :)