Zetas RIGHT Again! (Summary 1)

From: Nancy Lieder (nancy@zetatalk.com)
Subject: Re: Zetas RIGHT Again! (Summary 1)
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur

Date: 2001-11-29 04:00:27 PST

To refresh the readership as to what this thread was all about, ZetaTalk has, since it began in 1995, and as recorded on sci.astro archives from January 9, 1997 in Article <5b3363$go4@sjx-ixn4.ix.netcom.com>, stated that the Sun dominated the solar system with its magnetic orientation, reaching out to influence the planets in this regard, and that this orientation was STATIC. Key phrases from the 1997 posting are:

- "When the giant comet positions itself exactly between the Earth and its Sun, things change. The Earth then has its greatest advocate for its previous alignment, the Sun and its magnetic alignment, negated." THE SUN DETERMINES EARTH'S MAGNETIC ALIGNMENT

- "The Earth hears only the magnetic voice of the giant comet, so to speak, which stands between the Earth and its former magnetic commander, the Sun." THE SUN IS THE MAGNETIC COMMANDER OF THE EARTH

- "The Earth's crust resists aligning with the giant comet, being caught in a web of magnetic pulls from its immediate neighborhood. In other words, the Earth's crust wants to stay with the old, established, magnetic pull," THE SOLAR SYSTEM IS IN ALIGNMENT WITH THE SUN

Various ZetaTalk bashers stated the going theory about magnetic alignment in the solar system, that the Sun reversed its polarity during every solar cycle, and had just done so at the end of the last cycle in 2000 due to the VISUAL APPEARANCE of the Sun. Key quotes:

David W Knisely (ka0czc@navix.net)

> The sun reverses the polarity of its overall field
> roughly every 11 years or so.

Jim TRIV <3BD62F5C.39F39382@earthlink.net>

> This is a known fact.

David Tholen

> Yes

The debate was on.

From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Zetas RIGHT Again! (Summary 1)
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur

Date: 2001-11-29 11:09:17 PST

Nancy Lieder <nancy@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3C0623AD.B7985802@zetatalk.com>...

> > The debate was on. >

The only debate going on here is when you'll answer other questions posed to you, like:

1) Will you refund the money you've confiscated from your flock when Planet X doesn't appear, and reimburse them the rest of their money you've spent over the years researching "worm beds" and "rice and beans" and seeds? Yes or No

2) Will you promise never post on any science newsgroup again when Planet X doesn't appear? Yes or No

3) Will you claim the Zetas "moved" Planet X when if doesn't appear? Yes or No

4) Will you start posting the FULL debates posted here on your website, rather than just your posts? Yes or No

5) Will you admit to doctoring your website to change articles to reflect current events, rather than keeping them in the original form which showed error? Yes or No

6) Will you and your followers be willing to donate all the money in your "zeta" account to an astronomy related charity if Planet X doesn't appear as stated in your archived posts (not rewritten posts)? Yes or No

If you don't answer every single one of these questions, nothing you post on sci.astro or sci.astro.amateur can be taken as anything but a con game you're pulling on numerous people who frequent your "Troubled Times" and "Zetatalk" websites. If you don't answer the questions, consider it as proof that you're nothing but a con artist, cult leader wannabe, stealing monies from people to benefit yourself.

BACK