Regarding Planet X Debate...

From: Nancy Lieder (zetatalk@zetatalk.com)
Subject: Re: Regarding Planet X Debate...
Newsgroups: sci.astro, sci.astro.amateur
Date: 2002-03-09 08:24:06 PST

Herald Sun

Australia's biggest-selling daily newspaper

SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY

http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,3864813%255E11869,00.html

Searching for Planet X
By GRAEME HAMMOND
03mar02

IT'S out there somewhere, big, brown and dangerous - and it's heading
our way. It's Planet X, the fabled 10th planet of the solar system.
Noted 19th century English astronomer John Couch Adams was the first to
begin plotting its likely position after noticing strange deviations in
the orbit of Uranus - at that time the most distant planet known - that
suggested it was being tugged by the gravity of another body. Since
then dozens of eminent astronomers have followed the same hunch. The
search has thus far yielded two further planets - Neptune (1846) and
Pluto (1930) - but not the supersized "brown dwarf" they still think
exists.

Will a 10th be found? There are as many sceptics as believers. If it's
out there, says John Anderson at the NASA Jet Propulsion Laboratory, it
has a mass five times that of Earth's, takes as long as 1000 years to
orbit the Sun and is so far away its effects on the outermost planets
won't be detected again until 2600. But here's where the mystery
thickens. If it does exist and is coming back, what will the effects be
for Earth. Could it be that it was Planet X that killed the dinosaurs?
More to the point, if the world's best astronomers do prove its
existence and know it is returning, would they tell us?

Australian author Stephanie Relfe is among a band of New Age activists
who are convinced there is a conspiracy of silence. Relfe, whose books
include The Mars Records: Biofeedback Meter Sessions Where a Man
Regained Hidden Memories of Military Service on Mars and The Dangers of
Eating Microwave Food, has amassed a catalogue of evidence that suggests
Earth is due for a closer encounter than it would wish with Planet X in
late 2003. Among the claims on her website, www.metatech.org:

- NASA discovered and excitedly disclosed the existence of
Planet X on December 30, 1983. A Washington Post article
the next day quoted space researcher Dr James Houck
speculating that the object was as close to Earth as 80 billion
kilometres - "if it really is that close, it would be part of our
solar system," he said. Media controllers quickly gagged the
scientists responsible. One NASA expert, Dr Robert Harrington,
who continued to speak about a strange find, met an untimely
death in 1993.

- OBSERVATORIES continued to sight the planet last year.
To quash concerns, NASA announced it had found "the largest
asteroid in history" beyond Neptune.

- PLANET X has intentionally been made to sound ridiculous
and confusing in a bid to deflect interest.

- DRAMATIC changes in weather patterns and an upsurge of
earthquakes and volcanoes since the 1990s are a precursor
of what's to come. X's mass, magnetism and density is such
that it disrupts the surface of every planet it passes.

- NASA and US military chiefs are quietly building dome homes
to survive the coming cataclysm. "As many know, NASA has
covered up evidence of UFOs, Ets and structures on the Moon
and Mars for quite some time," writes co-conspiracist Mark
Hazlewood at his website, www.prep2003.com. He believes
the devastation will wipe out all but a few hundred million
people on Earth.

How do we survive? Head for the hills, says www.zetatalk.com, which
predicts that Planet X's passing will exert such a dramatic effect on
the magnetic poles and tectonic plates of Earth that all but the eastern
third of Australia will disappear under the waves.

END ARTICLE

From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Regarding Planet X Debate...
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-03-09 14:56:51 PST

(crosspost to sci.astro.amateur removed)


Nancy Lieder (ZetaCult Leader) <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3C8A386F.1EB847E2@zetatalk.com>

> Herald Sun

> Australia's biggest-selling daily rag

> SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY AND CONSPIRACIES

> http://www.heraldsun.news.com.au/common/story_page/0,5478,3864813%255E11869,00.html

<snip>

>
> Australian author Stephanie Relfe is among a band of New Age activists
> who are convinced there is a conspiracy of silence. Relfe, whose books
> include The Mars Records: Biofeedback Meter Sessions Where a Man
> Regained Hidden Memories of Military Service on Mars and The Dangers of
> Eating Microwave Food, has amassed a catalogue of evidence that suggests
> Earth is due for a closer encounter than it would wish with Planet X in
> late 2003. Among the claims on her website, www.metatech.org:

"New Age activist" says it all. The "conspiracy of silence" was just
an added attraction.


>
> - NASA discovered and excitedly disclosed the existence of
> Planet X on December 30, 1983. A Washington Post article
> the next day quoted space researcher Dr James Houck
> speculating that the object was as close to Earth as 80 billion
> kilometres - "if it really is that close, it would be part of our
> solar system," he said. Media controllers quickly gagged the
> scientists responsible. One NASA expert, Dr Robert Harrington,
> who continued to speak about a strange find, met an untimely
> death in 1993.

False Cult propaganda. That was almost 20 years ago Nancy, why do you
live in the past?

See:

http://spider.ipac.caltech.edu/staff/tchester/iras/no_tenth_planet_yet.html

>
> - OBSERVATORIES continued to sight the planet last year.
> To quash concerns, NASA announced it had found "the largest
> asteroid in history" beyond Neptune.

I don't remember any observatories reporting they had "continued to
sight the planet". We all know some people have thought they saw it,
especially after you told them that they did.

>
> - PLANET X has intentionally been made to sound ridiculous
> and confusing in a bid to deflect interest.

Only by your own posts to this newsgroup.

>
> - DRAMATIC changes in weather patterns and an upsurge of
> earthquakes and volcanoes since the 1990s are a precursor
> of what's to come. X's mass, magnetism and density is such
> that it disrupts the surface of every planet it passes.

We'll see about that in a few months. Of course, you'll be buried with
your head in the sand and won't know that it never showed up - but I
bet your worms will know.

>
> - NASA and US military chiefs are quietly building dome homes
> to survive the coming cataclysm. "As many know, NASA has
> covered up evidence of UFOs, Ets and structures on the Moon
> and Mars for quite some time," writes co-conspiracist Mark
> Hazlewood at his website, www.prep2003.com. He believes
> the devastation will wipe out all but a few hundred million
> people on Earth.

Yes, i have a nice little condo at Cydonia, very efficient. See the
other thread. Hate to tell you this, but your preparation plans won't
save your cult.

>
> How do we survive? Head for the hills, says www.zetatalk.com, which
> predicts that Planet X's passing will exert such a dramatic effect on
> the magnetic poles and tectonic plates of Earth that all but the eastern
> third of Australia will disappear under the waves.

Nope. There won't be anything but asteroids left when we get done with
Terra Nancy. No where is safe but Mars, and I'll be having a great old
time watching Earth from there.

BACK