From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Alternate Explanation in JUNE
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-05-05 06:18:40 PST
Nancy Lieder <nancy@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3CD3FBBD.D155010F@zetatalk.com>...
> Scientists reported Tuesday that other new systems on the
> upgraded Hubble have performed well. A high-tech
> cooling system is working and should soon revive an
> infrared camera that has been broken since 1998. The
> first images could be released in June."
> From: http://www.cnn.com/2002/TECH/space/04/30/hubble.pix/index.html
Well at least you can still read. The problem arises in your
comprehension of what you've read.
>
> Last April, 2001, the Zetas predicted:
> It was known that at this time, approximately February 1, 2001,
> [Planet X] would be visible without question to an observatory.
Obviously, they were wrong, since no observatory or amateur has
sighted their failed prediction.
> This activity is outside of US control, establishment control,
> they are braced for it. They cannot stop it, and know this, thus
> are not trying to do so. But will offer countering explanations
> for what has been found.
No one supplies "countering explanations" for something that hasn't
been found Nancy, except you.
<snip>
>
> Pierre-Eric took more infrared images on Jan 19, 2002, getting the
> original CCD from the camera and providing a comparison DSS from the
> ESO.
Then someone should call the observatory and tell them who it was that
vandalized their camera.
<snip>
>
> The reaction of the cover-up team to the Jan 19th images taken by Pierre
> at Haute-Provence was to huddle and then the NEAT images taken on Jan
> 19, 2002 shows odd contradictions, indications of a poorly done
> doctoring job, and were unavailable from the NASA web site for a month.
Please provide the "poorly done, doctored" images. If you can't, then
you're just a lying SOS. Assertions and accusations without proof are
like pissing into the wind Nancy, which you do a lot. Although it does
explain why you're "all wet" most of the time.
> So WHY would they be bothering to change the NEAT chart, when the object
> is moving and they'd be chasing it, an unknown path, with the Zeta
> coordinates only being given out six weeks or so in the future at a time?
No one gives a flying shit about your coordinates Nancy. There's
nothing there. Your accuracy is **zero**. You have nothing but
fabricated lies to resort to for explanations.
No object is moving. See Duncan's web page for proof - something
you've failed to provide. There is nothing at your "coordinates", nor
has there ever been, other than those objects which have long been
known to exist.
<snip>
>
> Check the Path diagram, showing roughly where the Zetas have predicted
> Planet X would be from now until March 3, 2003. The point where Planet
> X is NOW, in it's path, is darn close to where it will appear (per the
> Zeta prediction) on March 3, 2003! Very little motion expected! So,
> safe bet to build in an "existing object" on the NEAT charts, claim it
> was there all along. This should last for a YEAR, if they are lucky, so
> they can continue to shore up the carry-on government in bunkers,
> stockpile food for the rich and powerful in their enclaves, talk up the
> economy, and keep the little man dumb and happy until the last minute!
Ahh, so we see now. Since it's been proven there was nothing moving in
the images that have been provided, you now claim that your "planet X"
will stay at that point "with very little motion".
How conveinient, after 6 years of your planet wandering all over the
backdrop constellations of Orion and Taurus, in compete contradiction
to celestial mechanics, it now decides to "stop".
Now that images have been taken (of nothing moving) your object has
decided to take a new course. How are you going to explain the mag 20
luminosity of that star Nancy? Especially when it doesn't increase in
brightness when it gets image again this fall?
Going to claim conspiracy, yet again?
How does that fit in with your claims of mag 2 in infrared, or mag 11
in visible light, neither of which have been imaged or observed?
>
> And if the Alternate Explanation comes out now, Zeta RIGHT Again!
And we'll watch YOU create the "alternate explainations".
And if you make up your own "alternate explanations" (as in doctored
images and conspiracies) without proof, your Zetas are made out to be
fools again. Nothing like lying, mis-informed, uneducated aliens to
make up conspiracy stories to cover their failed predictions.
Isn't it just amazing how one can gain 100% accuracy without providing
any proof of the accuracy, or by just claiming that the accuracy was
hidden by conspiracy?
The only evidence you have is non-evidence. Amazing how people can
make something out of nothing.
Doesn't fly here Nancy. You have no proof, no documentation, no
evidence, nothing. You don't even have supporters anymore, your mental
instability is driving them away faster than you can recruit them.
What you *do* have, is a 6 year long recorded and documented history
of paranoia, bad astronomy, poor science and physics, failed
predictions, fear mongering, information manipulation, opinion
censuring, and an ongoing record of your deteriorating mental health.