From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Nancy went wild Apr 20
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-05-18 14:24:28 PST
imopenmind@netscape.net (I M Openmind) wrote in message news:<c6cdf9f8...
> sarahmac@hotpop.com (Sarah Mc) wrote in message news:<3c09ad3.020517...
> > imopenmind@netscape.net (I M Openmind) wrote in message news:<c6cd...
> > > While scanning the chat logs I came across this amazing revelation by
> > > Nancy:
> > > ----begin Nancy Quote----
> > > (NancyL) My son was telling me that the week before 911, Bush had the
> > > Taliban at his place in Texas, dealing to give Enron an oil deal
> > > through Afganistan, and they warned him of a possible 911 attack.
> > > (NancyL) This was on a late night talk show, someone who wrote a book
> > > about Bush and his scummy and incompetent activities.
> > > ----end Nancy Quote----
> >
> > Yeah, more Zeta extreme left wing politics.
> >
> > To make things even more interesting, Nancy's son (according to the
> > high priestess) holds some patents on dome-home construction. Now
> > ain't that a hoot.
> >
> > From TT-watch:
> > " My son is the biodome interlocking panel patent holder, a housing
> > means
> > that can withstand quakes and tornadoes and support indoor gardening
> > and
> > living, and I support him in his R&D work."
> >
> > Does that include creating false catastrophes in the minds of people
> > so that more dome homes will be sold?
>
>
> Actually, you didn't need the "left wing" crack. I am a certified
> bleeding heart liberal but that does not mean that I would subscribe
> to believing this kind of garbage about either the "W" or his father.
You don't consider Nancy to be "extreme" in her politics? And she's
certainly not a Republican.
Notice I said "extreme" left wing politics. I've been a registered
liberal for the last 20 years, and I work as a volunteer for the
Democrat party every year. I don't go around making absolutely
nonsensical claims that GW Bush, his father, or his family are guilty
of treason. Nancy does. Nancy is a discredit to the Democrat party, as
she is to all women on this planet. It's because of women like Nancy
that we have to fight twice as hard as men to get respect at our
workplaces, and to be taken seriously as contributors in once male
dominated industries and government.
Radical Liberals are no better than any radical right-wing political
whackos, like Neo Nazis or the extreme religious right. When you have
people on the fringe, they're always dangerous, regardless of what
side of the politcal fence they live on. Nancy and her "Zetas" have a
long history of encouraging extreme left wing dissent by providing
derogatory supposition about the Republican party, and the Bush family
in particular. Does that make her a good Democrat? Is that what our
party is all about? Has the Democrat party sunk so low in recent years
that we have to resort to false accusations, supposition and
conspiracy theories? If so, then the platform we stand upon should
never have been built in the first place.
I suppose if Nancy (and her Zetas) were inclined to the extreme right
wing, and I commented in such a fashion, it would have been OK?
Needless to say, this doesn't belong here on sci.astro anyhow, and I
probably shouldn't have replied. But, if you wish to continue the
discussion, email me privately.