From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Alternate Explanation 4
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-05-28 15:13:35 PST
Nancy Lieder <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3CF3A3CD.CBCDEA3@zetatalk.com>...
> In Article <c6cdf9f8.0205211540.66b2cb7c@posting.google.com>
> (was Re: Astronomers Ponder the Nature of an Ultracool Object in
> Orion)
> Open Minded wrote:
> > Hopefully someone with more expertise will give
> > us the real story before Nancy further enlightens us.
>
> I think the real story for all the attention suddenly being given to
> brown dwarfs, more visible in INFRARED, located in ORION, is so that
> when there is talk of a brown dwarf closer in, inbound, coming from this
> general area this can be (hopefully) dismissed by a wave of the hand as
> a 'misunderstanding". The general public will hear about OTHER brown
> dwarf's, in that area, and surmise that THIS was what the fuss was all
> about. Not exactly an Alternate Explanation, as the location is not
> close enough to the RA and Dec given by the Zetas for this time frame,
> but close enough to allow a dismissal of the ZetaTalk warning (or so it
> is hoped). Dare I say Zetas RIGHT Again? In April, 2001, the Zetas
> predicted:
>
> It was known that at this time, approximately February 1, 2001,
> [Planet X] would be visible without question to an observatory.
> This activity is outside of US control, establishment control,
> they are braced for it. They cannot stop it, and know this, thus
> are not trying to do so. But will offer countering explanations
> for what has been found.
> ZetaTalk?, Coordinates
> http://www.zetatalk.com/theword/tword03m.htm
>
> How many Alternate Explanations have we had, over this past year?
>
> 1. New Comet Discovered in Taurus, Aug 20, 2001
> 2. 2001PM9 Expected to Pass May 10, 2003
> 3. NEAT Chart Doctored to Include Jan 19, 2002 Object
> 4. Cool (but Far Away) Brown Dwarfs in Orion
Maybe they weren't alternate explanations at all, cult leader. Did you
ever stop to think that they might be real scientific discovery's
(other than number 3, which was made up by you)?
Give it a break Nancy, you're becoming a real boor. If you don't have
anything new to offer, don't make up silly, childish, illogical
explanations that don't need to be offered. Every time you do, you run
the risk of losing more of your cult members.
Of course, it doesn't help when your cult members post here, and then
you have to backtrack and cover what they said too. Maybe you should
send out the troops to make sure the cult members keep their mouths
shut.