Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate?

From: zetatalk (zetatalk@zetatalk.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-13 07:20:58 PST


SUMMARY

So, if a couple weeks or so ahead of passage (April 30, 2003) the Planet
X body itself would only appear to be 1/7 Jupiter size, at a distance
from earth of 1.216 B mls.

If the Planet X body itself would appear about 1/4 the size of the Moon
when approaching passage, and

If the swirl of its moons and the surrounding dust cloud gives it a size
approaching the size of the Moon, then

Can we quadruple the Planet X body size during comparison estimates
against a known, like Jupiter.

And thus, using Jim's calculations, on Aug 7, 2002 (apx this time) it
would be 1/139 the size of Jupiter, but due to the swirl, etc. it would
be 4/139, or approximately 3% the size of Jupiter for September, 2002
viewing.

Right?

From: Le Renard (jxlarrea@imaget.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-13 13:26:23 PST


Right? Well, only YOU know the answer Nancy as soon as you've already
made up a story to fit current events. Why dont you ask the Zetas the
EXACT (not aproximate) size? Have the Zetas left you alone?

You never reply other people postings, why? The only times you do is
when you think you got an appropiate answer for them, what you dont
realize is that those answers make you seem even more stupid. How old
are you Nancy? You're getting older every day you know? You still have
time to make a normal life and spend the last years of your life with
your family. Try to be HAPPY. You know you cant keep your lies forever
why not quitting NOW?

BTW, let me guess, by sepetember 2002, PX will be 4/139 the size of
jupiter and too small to be seen due to light polluition? Is that
right? or will it be possible to be seen? What does the ZETAS TELL
YOU?




zetatalk <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3D5915CA.8B0FD977@zetatalk.com>...
> SUMMARY
>
> So, if a couple weeks or so ahead of passage (April 30, 2003) the Planet
> X body itself would only appear to be 1/7 Jupiter size, at a distance
> from earth of 1.216 B mls.
>
> If the Planet X body itself would appear about 1/4 the size of the Moon
> when approaching passage, and
>
> If the swirl of its moons and the surrounding dust cloud gives it a size
> approaching the size of the Moon, then
>
> Can we quadruple the Planet X body size during comparison estimates
> against a known, like Jupiter.
>
> And thus, using Jim's calculations, on Aug 7, 2002 (apx this time) it
> would be 1/139 the size of Jupiter, but due to the swirl, etc. it would
> be 4/139, or approximately 3% the size of Jupiter for September, 2002
> viewing.
>
> Right?

From: enterprise2002 (brian.gillbanks@btinternet.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-13 14:14:45 PST


zetatalk <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3D5915CA.8B0FD977@zetatalk.com>...
> SUMMARY
>
> So, if a couple weeks or so ahead of passage (April 30, 2003) the Planet
> X body itself would only appear to be 1/7 Jupiter size, at a distance
> from earth of 1.216 B mls.
>
> If the Planet X body itself would appear about 1/4 the size of the Moon
> when approaching passage, and
>
> If the swirl of its moons and the surrounding dust cloud gives it a size
> approaching the size of the Moon, then
>
> Can we quadruple the Planet X body size during comparison estimates
> against a known, like Jupiter.
>
> And thus, using Jim's calculations, on Aug 7, 2002 (apx this time) it
> would be 1/139 the size of Jupiter, but due to the swirl, etc. it would
> be 4/139, or approximately 3% the size of Jupiter for September, 2002
> viewing.
>
> Right?

Just why is all this technical shit important? Can't the Zeta's
calculate size, mass and gravity? I though you two were good buddies?
Don't they help anymore? Have you had a row? And just what good is all
this information going to be during the next nine months? Or is it now
suddenly important to TRY and make Zetatalk accurate so you can do
what? (You haven't bother so far with the accuracy so why now?)

Surely all of this is mute, or are you just killing time. Cause' let's
face it, IF you're right, and I do stress "IF", then the
establishment, according to the Zeta's is just going to simply lie
through its back teeth, so no one will in fact believe it even if they
do see it, which is looking more and more unlikely. Which means all
THIS is mere bullshit game playing and simply a waste of effort.( Have
you nothing better to do?) In your scinario it's more likely you, me
and everyone here will be dead so what is the point? Or is this just
more limelight, fortune and glory for the remaining time left.

And that's how I cottoned on to your little game. No alien emissary
would be running around trying to convince the established fields of
an impending doomsday, certainly not on an amateur group like
sci-astro. You've said yourself that the authorities already know. The
Zeta's should be more interested in getting the word out to the
ordinary folks on the street, making headline news that the World
couldn't ignore. Bugger nice pretty web sites, pamphlets, video's and
books. Sod the deceitful claims of 100% accuracy. They'd be flooding
the world with irrefutable facts that couldn't be denied, and where
the average man couldn't find the answers the Zeta experts would be
seeing to it that their earthly agents via gentle pointers could
reveal the location of that vital information to the rest of the
world, which would even be allowed within the "rules of engagement".
The credibility of an alien emissary would be paramount, there could
be no doubt, not on a topic as serious as this because doubt in that
voice would cast a shadow over the whole project and you lady are not
that emissary as both you and the Zeta's have proved their mistakes.

So what is the real gig, (not that I expect an answer)? Nine month's
or less and we will know for sure. Mr Zeta's credibility will be
destroyed forever, so too will yours. No more book sales, no more tax
evasion. Every single scrap that's been written will prove to be
nothing more than worthless dribble and all the hard work and
dedication that's gone into TT for what? For nothing. Do you have any
comprehension of the damage you'll have caused on that day? The lives
you'll have destroyed? The hopes and dreams you'll have shattered?

I can only pray it does show up, if nothing else than to f**k up
whatever plans you've been making these last few years and I really do
hope it takes you with it, but I certainly wouldn't worry about any
stake burning as I'm sure there will be someone, just waiting out
there somewhere, with far more creative and deadly intent.

Brian (Angel Isle)

From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: Visible SIZE, Estimate?
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-13 15:21:58 PST


zetatalk <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> wrote in message news:<3D5915CA.8B0FD977@zetatalk.com>...
> SUMMARY
>
> So, if a couple weeks or so ahead of passage (April 30, 2003) the Planet
> X body itself would only appear to be 1/7 Jupiter size, at a distance
> from earth of 1.216 B mls.
>
> If the Planet X body itself would appear about 1/4 the size of the Moon
> when approaching passage, and
>
> If the swirl of its moons and the surrounding dust cloud gives it a size
> approaching the size of the Moon, then
>
> Can we quadruple the Planet X body size during comparison estimates
> against a known, like Jupiter.
>
> And thus, using Jim's calculations, on Aug 7, 2002 (apx this time) it
> would be 1/139 the size of Jupiter, but due to the swirl, etc. it would
> be 4/139, or approximately 3% the size of Jupiter for September, 2002
> viewing.
>
> Right?

Why ask us? Ask your silly Zeta friends. They're the ones with the
advanced mathematics that doesn't use a null. That way they can
account for a non-planet's visible size.

Besides, your Zetas already claimed that mag 20 stars would have to
visible to be able to see your silly planet. Doesn't that answer your
question?


http://www.zetatalk.com/poleshft/p155.htm

"To anticipate just when amateurs can with assurance see Planet X in
the night sky, look at the image taken on January 19th in France.
Compare the blur that is Planet X to neighboring stars. If, before
dawn, in the hour and hours before dawn, you cannot see all these
stars clearly, then you surely cannot see Planet X clearly."

BACK