Planet X: the Zeta REASONS

From: zetatalk (zetatalk@zetatalk.com)
Subject: Planet X: the Zeta REASONS
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-25 10:41:06 PST


At the Aug 24, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session issues related to
sci.astro becoming alt.flame.zetatalk were brought up. The Zetas also
stated some of their REASONS for not providing Planet X coordinates
until Sep 15th. I'll share ...

Agenda Items included:

DISINFO

1. What is behind the new slant on the xfacts.com site

"Don't believe the hype! Planet X returns in 2003!

This is not true! Show me the proof!" and the audio

statement by Zecharia Sitchin on that site that

Planet X will not return in 2003?

2. On sci.astro someone posted a link to a NASA Kid

Story titled "The 10 planets of our solar system,

including Nibiru (planet of the passing)"

http://kids.msfc.nasa.gov/Stories/ViewStory.asp?ID=754.

Was this just a submitting by a concerned child or

was it an intentional write-up by someone in NASA?

3. Space.com is now officially debunking Planet X

destroying earth in 2003! It seems like everyone is

trying to get a piece of the action saying it isn't

coming next year :-)

http://www.space.com/news/astronotes-1.html

NORLOCK

1. This Oleg from Russia says the Norlok space

probe from Russia took these photos of Planet "X"

and that Zetas are accurate. Is this a disinformation

hoax, or was there a real Norlok probe?

http://www.detailshere.com/norlock.htm

Session Start: Sat Aug 24 16:39:25 2002

(Grimbot) Welcome and g'day to you Nancy and the Zetas!

(NancyL) G'day to you, Grimbot.

(Matt) Oh dear a bot greeting

(Jeremy) Nancy: Could the Zetas provide their own distance
timetable for PX to us, or would that contravene any
rules they abide by?

(NancyL) Jeremy, they have their reasons for relying on
human distance measures. They explained WHAT the
differences are, that it zooms in faster, then slows more
while going past the Sun, etc.

(NancyL) Jeremy, the Z's are very skilled at playing games
with humans that would disinfo you to death. Often a
stumble is a deliberate bait and switch.

(NancyL) I've seen this so often as to recognize a game
plan when it evolves. Refusing to give THEIR maths
re distance and size has all the signs ...

(Jeremy) Nancy: Thanks for that, since they [Zetas] said
the tt chart was not accurate I was wondering if
providing distance figures to us it would help amateur
astronomers determine visiblity of PX easier.

and I prefaced the Zeta answer by:

(NancyL) This is combined asking about trends noticed.
Along these lines I added a table in the 2003 Source link
under the ZT banner, saying who is Pro and Con.

(NancyL) For instance, Norlock is saying ZT is right, but
the images are clearly fake (no dust cloud or moons, etc.)

(NancyL) For instance, McCanny stated on the PX Video
that 2003 will NOT be the date, and now supposedly
is saying it IS the date but it will come from opposite
direction from Orion.

(NancyL) For instance, Sitchin and Martel stating NOT in
2003, and NASA always in that stance (their stance is
no PX at all).

(NancyL) For instance, sci.astro has turned into, as Jan
stated, alt.flame.zetatalk, with so many threads
generated and posting that fully 1/2 of all new postings
on sci.astro are about ZT being a pile of poop.

(NancyL) This, in spite of the fact that I've hardly been
posting, weeks go by with no posting, and then one or
two about estimated size math.

(NancyL) Clearly, from my view as well as noticed by
others, a campaign to say NOT 2003 NO WAY AND
ZT IS A PILE OF POOP!

(NancyL) By staying away, a Zeta ploy, this campaign is
more obvious. Now the Z's comments.

And the Zeta answers, now on ZetaTalk as new pages titled

Campaigns and

Targeted Message,

were as follows on the next two postings:

Session Close: Sat Aug 24 18:28:33 2002

From: Sarah Mc (sarahmac@hotpop.com)
Subject: Re: Planet X: the Zeta REASONS
Newsgroups: sci.astro
Date: 2002-08-26 07:01:45 PST


zetatalk <zetatalk@zetatalk.com> tried to explain away her errors in
message news:<3D6916AE.19542F25@zetatalk.com>...

> At the Aug 24, 2002 Live ZetaTalk IRC Session issues related to
> sci.astro becoming alt.flame.zetatalk were brought up. The Zetas also
> stated some of their REASONS for not providing Planet X coordinates
> until Sep 15th. I'll share ...

Why don't you share this wonderful attempt to support yourself in
TT-watch, TT-news, TT-social, or TT-welcome?


We all know the reason it's posted here, so you can claim it was part
of a "debate" on sci.astro. No such luck High Priestess.


>
> Agenda Items included:
>
> DISINFO

> 1. What is behind the new slant on the xfacts.com site

> "Don't believe the hype! Planet X returns in 2003!

> This is not true! Show me the proof!" and the audio

> statement by Zecharia Sitchin on that site that

> Planet X will not return in 2003?

The fact that it doesn't exist.

>

> 2. On sci.astro someone posted a link to a NASA Kid

> Story titled "The 10 planets of our solar system,

> including Nibiru (planet of the passing)"

> http://kids.msfc.nasa.gov/Stories/ViewStory.asp?ID=754.

> Was this just a submitting by a concerned child or

> was it an intentional write-up by someone in NASA?

An obvious attempt to create your own conspiracy.

>

> 3. Space.com is now officially debunking Planet X

> destroying earth in 2003! It seems like everyone is

> trying to get a piece of the action saying it isn't

> coming next year :-)

> http://www.space.com/news/astronotes-1.html

Like they weren't officially denying it's existense before? When did
they ever support your far fetched claims?

>

> NORLOCK

> 1. This Oleg from Russia says the Norlok space

> probe from Russia took these photos of Planet "X"

> and that Zetas are accurate. Is this a disinformation

> hoax, or was there a real Norlok probe?

> http://www.detailshere.com/norlock.htm

This one is rich.

<snip>

>

> and I prefaced the Zeta answer by:

<snip>

> (NancyL) For instance, sci.astro has turned into, as Jan

> stated, alt.flame.zetatalk, with so many threads

> generated and posting that fully 1/2 of all new postings

> on sci.astro are about ZT being a pile of poop.

Yes, all started because you began posting as "ABC".

> (NancyL) This, in spite of the fact that I've hardly been

> posting, weeks go by with no posting, and then one or

> two about estimated size math.

Except for your posts as "ABC"

> (NancyL) Clearly, from my view as well as noticed by

> others, a campaign to say NOT 2003 NO WAY AND

> ZT IS A PILE OF POOP!

No need for a "campaign", you do quite well by yourself to illustrate
it's impossibility.

> (NancyL) By staying away, a Zeta ploy, this campaign is

> more obvious. Now the Z's comments.

A Zeta ploy? More like you have nothing to offer as proof, so you
create sock puppets to support your position while you're "away".


Why no posting of your attacks on people during the last session?

[17:48] <NancyL> Howmo, what about YOUR predictions that have come
true? What are those, Howmo, and why should we listen to YOU?

[17:51] <NancyL> Piet is another one, has NOTHING to offer but is here
throwing tomatoes. Your prediction accuracy track record, Piet?

[17:51] <NancyL> Howmo, there is nothing between your ears :-). Round
noise, that moved :-).

[17:52] <NancyL> Obany, we are going to bounce Howmo and Piet is this
is all they can do. Cat callers have been heard, have stated their
piece, and when they restate the same thing over and over again, then
the purpose is obvious.

[17:53] <NancyL> Obany, not /ignore, ban for the hour, please.

[17:53] <NancyL> Piet, you can't recognize a straight fact when you
see it, so why be here? Go have a beer and bugger off!

[18:14] <NancyL> Ribot, my mission is NOT to prove anything to you.

[18:51] <NancyL> Shaddy, Bush in TX is trying to plot all he is not
talking about, no question :-)

[18:52] <NancyL> Piet, who are YOU to make any kind of statement.

[18:59] <NancyL> Jan, your occasional posts, as with ABC, are jewels.

And my favorite, she calls me a dope when she couldn't understand what
I was talking about - explaining that IMO's coordinates were based on
her June 02 and May 03 stated coordinates.

[19:16] <silk> Will the Zetas provide a magnitude with the coordinates
Sept 16th?

[19:18] <silk> how can it be disinfor when you provided the final
coordinates Nancy?

[19:18] <silk> how hard is it to draw a minuscule line from here to
there?

[19:18] <silk> unles Planet X is going to go an torrid rampage around
the night sky

[19:20] <NancyL> Silk, you're assuming a straight line! A NEW ZT
Emissary! SILK!

Nancy assumes that her planet is going to fly all over the night sky,
when the "July 02" coordinates are only a couple degrees in Dec and a
few minutes in RA away from the May 03 coordinates. Nancy has no
concept of what she's being told, and has no awareness that her answer
had nothing to do with the question.

The whole field, encompassing both July 02 and May 03 coordinates, is
visible in my 8x50 finder. If I "looked around" that field (as
according to the Zetas), it would only take 20 minutes or so, maybe 45
if I was very careful and spent a lot of time between slews. If I did
an automated search, it would take even less time.

Basically, what Nancy is telling us, is that her "new" coordinates in
Sept will not be between the July 02 and May 03 coordinates. Planet X
is going to start "flying around" with an emphemeris that violates all
known laws of celestial mechanics.

But then, it's been doing this all along, I guess we shouldn't be
surprised.

[19:21] <NancyL> Michael C, who earns his living insulting ZT and
disinfo, REAL images will be posted by me, who has integrity,
certainly not YOU, who has never predicted, nor have a prediction
accuracy.

So there we have it. Nancy will provide the images of Planet X come
this fall. All other images without Planet X will be termed
"disinformation" and "edited" images. After her false claims about
IMO's images, I'd be surprised if anyone would even offer her an
image.

BACK