The Skeptical Mind : ZetaTalk, The Grand Conspiracy 1995

Subject: Zeta accuracy, yea right! #1
From: brian.gillbanks@btinternet.com (enterprise2002)
Newsgroups: sci.astro

Well now seeing as talk now revolves around Zeta accuracy let's just
draw attention to one or two facts and by that I mean provable
evidence not speculation and rumour. (I'd post on TT but it would seem
Jan no name, no address and "Mr Epitome of hide himself away", doesn't
like me being on there.)

(Oh and before I start my e-mail IP address like all mail IP's are
protected by the ISP server. Only they can verify the owners true
identity, which I might add they're not likely to share with you but
then come to think of it not with anyone including government
conspiracy agencies without a damn good reason. However my profile is
available on Nancy's own Troubled Times website for anyone to read
lest they think I'm hiding or somehow trying to remain anonymous. My
home address in the UK is my own business, but should anyone be that
desperate try popping me a line and I'll decide whether or not to
share it.)

So back to accuracy. Let's start with Stonehenge then I'll cover the
rest of the topics as they appear on the site.

ZetaTalk: Stonehenge:

http://www.zetatalk.com/orientat/o26.htm

"Stonehenge is ancient, far older than man assumes. Its purpose is
confused because of its age. Was it a sacrificial site? Was it an
astronomical measure? Was it simply a place for lovers to meet in the
moonlight? No records remain. No peoples remain in whose memory
Stonehenge has a place. It stands, bleak and cold, its secrets a
mystery so deep that none can fathom them. Yet the mystery is easily
answered if the ages are taken into account. Stonehenge is older than
the visitors from the 12th Planet. Older than the wandering of the
cavemen, mankind's earliest numbers..............(lot more blurb
edited to save space and time.)"

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

----------------------------------------------------------

Snag is the Zeta's neglected to tell you, Nancy that Stonehenge is
neither located on the original site nor does it's remaining
construction stand testimony to any ancient culture as it was rebuilt
less than a hundred years ago with most of its structure now firmly
embedded in concrete, something I believe ancient man knew little or
nothing about.

Proof:

Western Daily Press / Bristol UK - January 9 2001

http://www.keirle.freeserve.co.uk/page19.htm

(Although available on other sites I picked this one as it was the

first I came across. Also includes period photographs.)

"But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological
controversy - and following interest displayed by historical
researcher Brian Edwards and the Western Daily Press - the brochures
will be re-written, to include the "forgotten years."

The years when teams of navies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the
British Empire to hoist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into
position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the huge sarsens.

As Mr. Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology
following his revelations that nearby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s
rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says:

"What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is
reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years
ago.

"It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation
of prehistoric peoples.

"What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old."

In archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite.

English Heritage run Stonehenge on behalf of the nation, and an
English Heritage insider revealed: "Dark forces were at work in the
70s , when a decision was taken to drop the information about the
restorations. Now that is about to change."

Mr. Edwards said: "Let's face it, Stonehenge was historically
cleansed. And the true history was hidden away.

"There should be no shame about the series of restorations. That's
what happened ...and is a fascinating part of the Stonehenge story
which should be told.

How is it such an intellegent species knows so little about a subject
they profess to know all. Dosen't make them appear very intellegent
does it."

----------------------------------------------------------

Did the Zeta's neglect to inform you of this little fact? When they
spouted how Stonehenge had faired well in previous shifts. Did they
somehow forget to tell you that most of it was lying scattered around
waiting for archaeologists to discover and re-assemble as they saw
fit? Granted it would do better this time around if the twelfth planet
ever did show up but then they're cemented in place, another fact they
missed.

Zeta's 0.

Truth 1.

(By the bye she doesn't read the replies you know, just posts and
runs.)

Brian (Angel Isle)


	Zeta accuracy, yea right! #1
	Subject: Zeta accuracy, yea right! #1 From: brian.gillbanks@btinternet.com (enterprise2002) Newsgroups: sci.astro Well now seeing as talk now revolves around Zeta accuracy let's just draw attention to one or two facts and by that I mean provable evidence not speculation and rumour. (I'd post on TT but it would seem Jan no name, no address and "Mr Epitome of hide himself away", doesn't like me being on there.) (Oh and before I start my e-mail IP address like all mail IP's are protected by the ISP server. Only they can verify the owners true identity, which I might add they're not likely to share with you but then come to think of it not with anyone including government conspiracy agencies without a damn good reason. However my profile is available on Nancy's own Troubled Times website for anyone to read lest they think I'm hiding or somehow trying to remain anonymous. My home address in the UK is my own business, but should anyone be that desperate try popping me a line and I'll decide whether or not to share it.) So back to accuracy. Let's start with Stonehenge then I'll cover the rest of the topics as they appear on the site. ZetaTalk: Stonehenge: http://www.zetatalk.com/orientat/o26.htm "Stonehenge is ancient, far older than man assumes. Its purpose is confused because of its age. Was it a sacrificial site? Was it an astronomical measure? Was it simply a place for lovers to meet in the moonlight? No records remain. No peoples remain in whose memory Stonehenge has a place. It stands, bleak and cold, its secrets a mystery so deep that none can fathom them. Yet the mystery is easily answered if the ages are taken into account. Stonehenge is older than the visitors from the 12th Planet. Older than the wandering of the cavemen, mankind's earliest numbers..............(lot more blurb edited to save space and time.)" All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com ---------------------------------------------------------- Snag is the Zeta's neglected to tell you, Nancy that Stonehenge is neither located on the original site nor does it's remaining construction stand testimony to any ancient culture as it was rebuilt less than a hundred years ago with most of its structure now firmly embedded in concrete, something I believe ancient man knew little or nothing about. Proof: Western Daily Press / Bristol UK - January 9 2001 http://www.keirle.freeserve.co.uk/page19.htm (Although available on other sites I picked this one as it was the first I came across. Also includes period photographs.) "But now, as if to head off a potential great archaeological controversy - and following interest displayed by historical researcher Brian Edwards and the Western Daily Press - the brochures will be re-written, to include the "forgotten years." The years when teams of navies sat aboard the greatest cranes in the British Empire to hoist stones upright; drag leaning trilithons into position, replace fallen lintels which once sat atop the huge sarsens. As Mr. Edwards - the erstwhile enfant terrible of British archaeology following his revelations that nearby Avebury was a total 20s and 30s rebuild by marmalade millionaire Alexander Keiller - says: "What we have been looking at is a 20th Century landscape, which is reminiscent of what Stonehenge MIGHT have been like thousands of years ago. "It has been created by the heritage industry and is NOT the creation of prehistoric peoples. "What we saw at the Millennium is less than 50 years old." In archaeological terms the re-writing of the guidebooks is dynamite. English Heritage run Stonehenge on behalf of the nation, and an English Heritage insider revealed: "Dark forces were at work in the 70s , when a decision was taken to drop the information about the restorations. Now that is about to change." Mr. Edwards said: "Let's face it, Stonehenge was historically cleansed. And the true history was hidden away. "There should be no shame about the series of restorations. That's what happened ...and is a fascinating part of the Stonehenge story which should be told. How is it such an intellegent species knows so little about a subject they profess to know all. Dosen't make them appear very intellegent does it." ---------------------------------------------------------- Did the Zeta's neglect to inform you of this little fact? When they spouted how Stonehenge had faired well in previous shifts. Did they somehow forget to tell you that most of it was lying scattered around waiting for archaeologists to discover and re-assemble as they saw fit? Granted it would do better this time around if the twelfth planet ever did show up but then they're cemented in place, another fact they missed. Zeta's 0. Truth 1. (By the bye she doesn't read the replies you know, just posts and runs.) Brian (Angel Isle)
	BACK