The Skeptical Mind : ZetaTalk, The Grand Conspiracy 1995

Zeta Prophets 2000 - 2001

First appears on the 15th Jan 2001

http://www.zetatalk.com/transfor/t100.htm

During 2001:

"An overall phrase to describe 2001 will be that things are getting shaky. Earthquakes increasing in frequency and intensity, and storm damage continues so that insurance companies will begin to falter and fail if not bolstered by government intervention."

Well true to form we start with earthquakes and again everything as before almost word for word.

"The weather is becoming more erratic so that any attempt to pretend that crop shortages are not occurring, worldwide, is no longer possible. Food prices will rise or there will be shortages in the stores, unless governments step in with price freezes and forced disbursal of goods to the populace. Starvation, already occurring in many countries, will increase, but the starving will have less of a voice as time goes on, and be increasingly ignored."

But there were no massive crop failures in 2001. No price increases. No shortages. No price freeze by any government. In fact everything was the same as 2000, apart from the new conflict in Afganistan with the US now providing them with aid.

"Economic impacts are beginning to bump into each other, one causing the other, so that the economic result is beyond a recession and threatening to become a worldwide depression."

Same as before, yet there was no world wide depression in 2000 so I guess we can dismiss that one.

"The economic drain from disasters affects individuals and their ability to work, villages and cities and their ability to provide services, and corporations that are dependent upon customers. Disasters can result in increased opportunity, but only if a source of aid is available, and when aid is withdrawn, or not provided, disasters become an economic drain. Aid between countries is being cut off, with little fanfare in the donor countries so the populace will not become alarmed."

Economic drain? There weren't any except in those counties already well versed in localised yearly disasters. Aid remained roughly the same, along with the countries who needed it, but no increase and no substantial drain. Pretty much what has been said before.

"Businesses dependent upon their investments in Third World countries will then fail, once again creating a shaky economic environment."

So which companies failed in 2000 due to this dependency? Anyone know?

"When the response of a given government is less than what the populace has come to expect, there will be protests or riots, depending upon the culture. Strong arm tactics will increase, jailing the protesters and creating curfews or travel restrictions."

Apart from a certain 911 incident nothing outstanding took place. However I notice the Zeta's failed to predict this event, probably under the rules of something or other. Although it would have made one hell of an attention grabber and gone a very long way in increasing her credibility.

"Since a common tactic to distract a restless populace is an outside threat, governments of many countries will saber-rattle, pointing the finger elsewhere and making threats and demands. This will not lead to war, as none of these countries would gain by war, in that the whole world is affected by the economic and crop disasters. There is no prize. So the demands made, one country upon another, to correct what is seen as a cause elsewhere, will be loud, but not followed by actions other than those of a paper dragon variety - all noise, but no substance."

Most political manoeuvres involving some kind of conflict use the intimidation wild card. Each throwing threats wily-nily to cause as much panic and fear as they can, before the crunch comes. Neither really want to be the first unless the game plan has been scripted then it follows a particular pattern. Just check out the history books and I'm sure you'll see what I mean. But by then we'd had 911 and all major government's had gone overboard with their military homeland might. So Nancy was only really mirroring yet more current trends. Simple observations, and not a prediction

All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com

Back in the present, mid 2002 and there are still no substancial increases in anything Nancy and the Zeta's have mentioned.

Brian (Angel Isle)


	The Zeta Prophets 2000-2001
	Zeta Prophets 2000 - 2001 First appears on the 15th Jan 2001 http://www.zetatalk.com/transfor/t100.htm During 2001: "An overall phrase to describe 2001 will be that things are getting shaky. Earthquakes increasing in frequency and intensity, and storm damage continues so that insurance companies will begin to falter and fail if not bolstered by government intervention." Well true to form we start with earthquakes and again everything as before almost word for word. "The weather is becoming more erratic so that any attempt to pretend that crop shortages are not occurring, worldwide, is no longer possible. Food prices will rise or there will be shortages in the stores, unless governments step in with price freezes and forced disbursal of goods to the populace. Starvation, already occurring in many countries, will increase, but the starving will have less of a voice as time goes on, and be increasingly ignored." But there were no massive crop failures in 2001. No price increases. No shortages. No price freeze by any government. In fact everything was the same as 2000, apart from the new conflict in Afganistan with the US now providing them with aid. "Economic impacts are beginning to bump into each other, one causing the other, so that the economic result is beyond a recession and threatening to become a worldwide depression." Same as before, yet there was no world wide depression in 2000 so I guess we can dismiss that one. "The economic drain from disasters affects individuals and their ability to work, villages and cities and their ability to provide services, and corporations that are dependent upon customers. Disasters can result in increased opportunity, but only if a source of aid is available, and when aid is withdrawn, or not provided, disasters become an economic drain. Aid between countries is being cut off, with little fanfare in the donor countries so the populace will not become alarmed." Economic drain? There weren't any except in those counties already well versed in localised yearly disasters. Aid remained roughly the same, along with the countries who needed it, but no increase and no substantial drain. Pretty much what has been said before. "Businesses dependent upon their investments in Third World countries will then fail, once again creating a shaky economic environment." So which companies failed in 2000 due to this dependency? Anyone know? "When the response of a given government is less than what the populace has come to expect, there will be protests or riots, depending upon the culture. Strong arm tactics will increase, jailing the protesters and creating curfews or travel restrictions." Apart from a certain 911 incident nothing outstanding took place. However I notice the Zeta's failed to predict this event, probably under the rules of something or other. Although it would have made one hell of an attention grabber and gone a very long way in increasing her credibility. "Since a common tactic to distract a restless populace is an outside threat, governments of many countries will saber-rattle, pointing the finger elsewhere and making threats and demands. This will not lead to war, as none of these countries would gain by war, in that the whole world is affected by the economic and crop disasters. There is no prize. So the demands made, one country upon another, to correct what is seen as a cause elsewhere, will be loud, but not followed by actions other than those of a paper dragon variety - all noise, but no substance." Most political manoeuvres involving some kind of conflict use the intimidation wild card. Each throwing threats wily-nily to cause as much panic and fear as they can, before the crunch comes. Neither really want to be the first unless the game plan has been scripted then it follows a particular pattern. Just check out the history books and I'm sure you'll see what I mean. But by then we'd had 911 and all major government's had gone overboard with their military homeland might. So Nancy was only really mirroring yet more current trends. Simple observations, and not a prediction All rights reserved: ZetaTalk@ZetaTalk.com Back in the present, mid 2002 and there are still no substancial increases in anything Nancy and the Zeta's have mentioned. Brian (Angel Isle)
	BACK